The Great Patriotic War: the Villainous Hitler’s Plan or the Provoсation?

43504001 1241631100 427 big 500x330 The Great Patriotic War: the Villainous Hitlers Plan or the Provoсation?

Mil­i­tary Parade in Moscow

In accor­dance with the offi­cial his­tory the Sec­ond World War  (in Rus­sia called ‘the Great Patri­otic War’) was com­menced on the Soviet ter­ri­tory by Ger­many: the treach­er­ous attack on 22 June, 1941when they invaded into the USSR.  This offi­cial ver­sion of the Soviet Gov­ern­ment is writ­ten in every his­tory book.  At the same time there is numer­ous evi­dence of Stalin’s desire to start the war first with the inten­tion sim­i­lar to Hitler’s . And that is why there is the the­ory that Stalin pro­voked Ger­man aggres­sion against the USSR.

In 1939 the USSR gov­ern­ment signed a his­tor­i­cal agree­ment with Ger­many (‘the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact”). This non-aggression pact guar­an­teed that both par­ties never make war with each other. Sign­ing this doc­u­ment, the USSR implic­itly per­mit­ted Ger­many to com­mence the war against the West.  This would have allowed Stalin to start the eman­ci­pa­tion move­ment of the coun­tries which would have been invaded by Hitler. It was the right moment – Ger­many, exhausted with its West­ern cam­paign, would not have been able to fight in the East (East being the West of the USSR), should the USSR invade the Ger­man bor­ders later. By win­ning the war with Hitler, the USSR would become the main World Sav­iour and, as per the Lenin’s pre­cept, it may be the start of World Com­mu­nism Revolution.

What would have hap­pened if the USSR began that war?  The war – is the Mother of rev­o­lu­tion, and the world war – the mother of World rev­o­lu­tion.  Accord­ing to the main rev­o­lu­tion philoso­pher Friedrich Engels, the World War with the vic­tory of Com­mu­nists would result in the ‘total exhaus­tion and cre­ation of con­di­tions for the ulti­mate vic­tory of the labour force’. For­tu­nately, this guy died before the Sec­ond World War and, unfor­tu­nately, Lenin — the fol­lower of the idea of World Rev­o­lu­tion gained an access to power in Rus­sia and cre­ated the mon­ster Stalin.

Joachim von Ribbentrop third from right watches his Soviet counterpart Vyacheslav Molotov seated sign the Molotov Ribbentrop Pact of non aggression on Aug. 23 1939. Josef Stalin 500x410 The Great Patriotic War: the Villainous Hitlers Plan or the Provoсation?

Joachim von Ribben­trop third from right watches his Soviet coun­ter­part Vyach­eslav Molo­tov seated sign the Molo­tov Ribben­trop Pact of non-aggression on Aug. 23 1939. Josef Stalin (AP Photo/File)

In 1939 a  Ger­man colonel Heinz Gud­er­ian paid a visit to the Soviet Loco­mo­tive Fac­tory which also pro­duced tanks. The num­ber of tanks pro­duced daily was 22(!). That was a time when Sovi­ets were not par­tic­i­pated in any war. Just six years prior to that, Ger­many which was not at war, did not have any tanks at all.  Also when Ger­many com­menced the war they had only 3200 tanks – the same amount which could have been pro­duced by the Soviet loco­mo­tive fac­tory for less than half a year! And now a lit­tle bit about those tanks. Sim­i­lar to the Soviet cars, copied from the Amer­i­can tem­plates, that tank’s pro­to­type was first cre­ated in the USA (where it was never put into mass pro­duc­tion) and trans­ferred to the USSR with the utter­ance of forged doc­u­ments where it was listed as the agri­cul­tural tractor.

Later, this ‘trac­tor’ was copied and then assem­bled in tremen­dous num­bers  under the brand HST – High-Speed Tank. First HST could gather speed of 100 km/h. Even at present this speed for the tank is con­sid­ered to be enor­mous. The shape of the tank’s body was sim­ple and ratio­nal. None of the tanks in the World had such an armour shape. The best tank of the Sec­ond World War, T34, was the direct descen­dant of the HST. The prin­ci­ples used in this tank was later copied by the Ger­man ‘Pan­ther’ and then spread in the world. In 1936 these tanks could move on the bot­tom of the deep creek — almost under­wa­ter. In 1938 these tanks were assem­bled with the diesel engines – unprece­dented fea­ture for that time. Finally, these tanks were equipped with the very pow­er­ful weapon. Those tanks had only one dis­ad­van­tage – they were use­less on the ter­ri­tory of the Soviet Union as they were not adapted for the impass­abil­ity of roads rather than to good roads of  Europe…

bt7 10 The Great Patriotic War: the Villainous Hitlers Plan or the Provoсation?

BT-7 — High Speed Tank

Another instance of Soviet pre-war weapon was the Soviet pur­suit plane which was the first one in the world equipped with rock­ets. By that time the Soviet engi­neers already cre­ated the unique plane IL-2 with the armour body – the real “tank” able to fly, with the super power equip­ment includ­ing 8 rocket mis­siles. Did the Soviet avi­a­tion have the supremacy in the air then? No.

Mostly Russ­ian pilots includ­ing the pilots of pur­suit planes were not trained to con­duct the fight in the air, rather they could strike the tar­gets on the ground. Accord­ing to the code of the mil­i­tary avi­a­tion they were directed to con­duct one supe­rior offen­sive war destroy­ing the enemy planes on the air­fields and then hold­ing the supremacy in the air. In 1929 the mag­a­zine ‘War and Rev­o­lu­tion’ in the arti­cle ‘The begin­ning of the War’ con­cluded: ‘It is very advan­ta­geous to seize the ini­tia­tive and start the war first, mak­ing a sur­prise attack’. Later, this con­clu­sion was cited in all the Soviet avi­a­tion codes.

il2 1 500x315 The Great Patriotic War: the Villainous Hitlers Plan or the Provoсation?

IL-2 — Fly­ing Tank

One more proof to the alter­na­tive ver­sion of the offen­sive war inten­tions were the how­itzer artillery groups cre­ated in the USSR as a part of the Red Army mil­i­tary force. If the Sovet gov­ern­ment pre­pared to the defen­sive actions then they would have pro­duced can­nons as they are ini­tially designed for defence – as graz­ing fire forces the enemy to stop. In an oppo­site case, how­ever, how­itzer is bet­ter as it has a high-angle fire tra­jec­tory and proved to be the best to smoke out the defender from the trench. Should the Sovi­ets pre­dict  the defen­sive actions they would def­i­nitely have built can­nons rather than howitzers.

The debates over the dif­fer­ent ver­sions of  the rea­sons of Ger­many attack­ing the USSR have started in early 90s. These debates are con­cen­trated on Stalin’s obscure inten­tions when he maimed the entire coun­try while cre­at­ing the unique sys­tem of gov­er­nance. What was his ulti­mate purpose?

There are only two pos­si­ble out­comes – the first one is com­pli­men­tary for the USSR while the sec­ond one is dete­ri­o­ra­tive. Unfor­tu­nately for the Soviet adher­ents there is no proof that Stalin pre­pared for the defen­sive war and this fact puts the Stalin’s regime on the same line with the Hitler Nazi one.  Some­times it seems to be bet­ter not to look back in his­tory where the old myths let the Stalin’s sup­port­ers live in a fool’s paradise.


Related posts:

  1. The Vic­tory After­math. Rus­sia in Sec­ond World War.
  2. Cold Clone War
  3. Happy Birth­day Dear USSR! The Great Octo­ber Social­ist Rev­o­lu­tion. Novem­ber 7th 1917.
  4. Declas­si­fied: the Great and Pow­er­ful Stalin.
  5. Best of Fall 2009

  • Brad

    Inter­est­ing post, but didn’t Hitler wish to enslave Slavs, and take east­ern ter­ri­tory for “liv­ing space?” And didn’t Stalin cam­paign for “social­ism in one coun­try?” It seems a bit unfair and cruel (and neo-nazi revi­sion­ist) to blame the USSR for schem­ing the war.

  • sam­nang

    From my under­stand­ing of CCCP and Nazi his­tory, Stalin signed the Non-Aggression Pact with Hitler for one pur­pose — to give CCCP more time to build weapons to attack Germany.

    Do you think that CCCP inva­sion of Poland in Sep­tem­ber 1939 to assist the Nazis was partly to take Poland, but also for CCCP to demon­strate to the Ger­mans the mil­i­tary capa­bil­ity of Soviet forces?

  • Eugene

    First of all check your facts and sources.

    Just a few exam­ples:
    Your blog — “Also when Ger­many com­menced the war they had only 3200 tanks “
    Wikipedia on plan Bar­barossa, i.e. the USSR inva­sion — 3600 tanks — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barbarossa. I am assum­ing there were also some tanks left in Europe and North Africa, right?

    Your blog — First HST could gather speed of 100 km/h.
    Wikipedia — 72kmh — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BT_tank

    This post basi­cally sup­ports a con­spir­acy the­ory pop­u­lar­ized by a GRU defec­tor Vladimir Rezun, aka Vik­tor Suvorov, the author of the book called the Ice­breaker — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icebreaker_%28Suvo…

    This con­spir­acy the­ory is com­pletely ground­less and is based on manip­u­la­tion of facts (much like most of con­sipracy theories).

    Let me men­tion just one things that might clar­ify the state of the Red Army around that time and why the war came so unex­pected to the Sovi­ets. It was the Great Purge, i.e. Stal­ins repres­sions. Here’s a quote on that from wikipedia: “The purge of the army removed three of five mar­shals (then equiv­a­lent to six-star gen­er­als), 13 of 15 army com­man­ders (then equiv­a­lent to four– and five-star gen­er­als), eight of nine admi­rals (the purge fell heav­ily on the Navy, who were sus­pected of exploit­ing their oppor­tu­ni­ties for for­eign contacts[22]), 50 of 57 army corps com­man­ders, 154 out of 186 divi­sion com­man­ders, 16 of 16 army com­mis­sars, and 25 of 28 army corps com­mis­sars” — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge#Purge_…. If you loose so many offi­cers in your army your over­all level of readi­ness and pro­fes­sion­al­ism plummets.

    Need I say more?

  • kiwide­mon

    Thanks for your opin­ion. It is impor­tant to men­tion that this arti­cle does not dimin­ish the cru­elty, mean­ness and treach­ery of fas­cists. It has been writ­ten only to show another out­look on the rea­sons of the begin­ning of the war as far as this ver­sion exists and has quite a num­ber of supporters.

  • kiwide­mon

    Thanks for the com­ment. Dis­cus­sion is always more than wel­come at the RealUssr, so if you want to say more, please, do.

    You are right, this con­spir­acy the­ory was first devel­oped and dis­cussed in the book Ice­breaker writ­ten by Vik­tor Suvorov.

    After the book was writ­ten it emerged the heated hot dis­cus­sion not only amongst the dilet­tantes but also among his­to­ri­ans. Most of them dis­proved the fig­ures shown in the book (as for the speed of the tank that was not 100, but 75 km/h). Nev­er­the­less, all the refu­ta­tions were about insignif­i­cant details rather than about the entire course of the book.

    As far as this ver­sion was never com­pletely dis­proved or, con­trary been proved, we decided to show it to our audi­ence as it cer­tainly has the right to exist.

  • kiwide­mon

    Thank you for show­ing inter­est to the arti­cle. There are var­i­ous views on the rea­sons for Soviet aggres­sion against Poland in 1939. With­out ques­tion, implic­itly or delib­er­ately, the inva­sion of Poland demon­strated the mil­i­tary might of the Sovi­ets at that time.

  • http://serjshaklein.livejournal.com/ Serj

    Fail.
    First photo made at The Vic­tory Parade. 1945.

  • http://realussr.com stas-kulesh

    Fixed.

  • http://www.realussr.com/ussr/best-of-fall-2009/ Best of Fall 2009 | Real USSR

    […] The Great Patri­otic War: the Vil­lain­ous Hitler’s Plan or the Provokation? […]

  • http://www.facebook.com/PremiumDiamondDiscounts Ran­dall Hitt

    Wow, you really must despise the USSR to under­take this level of his­tor­i­cal revisionism.

  • http://www.facebook.com/PremiumDiamondDiscounts Ran­dall Hitt

    Wow, you really must despise the USSR to under­take this level of his­tor­i­cal revisionism.

  • Eva For­ever

    As my inter­est in the sub­ject becomes more pro­found, I tend to do more research in this direc­tion. The more I find — the more I dis­like my Soviet past ( I would not go as far as to say I despise it, this is too emo­tional of a word for a sim­ple inter­net project). I con­sider the USSR to be a badly planned, poorly exe­cuted ruth­less project, which was guilty as charged of crimes against the Soviet human­ity.
    It was dying in con­vul­sions long before it ended, and I am happy it stopped right there.

  • Eva For­ever

    Besides, this entry is tagged as “alter­na­tive ver­sion”, which only sug­gests an alter­na­tive point of view on the events of those days, not the absolute truth. I am a great believer that dif­fer­ences in opin­ions stim­u­late a healthy dis­cus­sion, so here we have it.

  • Anony­mous